Deportation and removal cases involving Somali nationals require expert evidence on return risk, particularly under the MOJ diaspora test for returns to Mogadishu. The Home Office may assert that return is safe based on MOJ's general finding for ordinary civilians, but expert evidence can demonstrate that the specific individual's profile creates Article 3 risk.
Failed asylum seekers returned from the UK face distinct risks including destitution without clan support, targeting as Western returnees, and inability to integrate into Mogadishu's clan-based social structure. UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines (2024) caution against generalised return to Somalia.
Expert reports for removal cases address the appellant's clan connections, remittance networks, personal profile, and current security conditions. Reports may also address whether return to Somaliland or Puntland is viable as an alternative to Mogadishu.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can expert evidence prevent removal to Somalia?
Expert evidence demonstrating that the specific individual faces Article 3 risk on return can support challenges to removal. This is particularly strong where the appellant lacks clan support in Mogadishu, belongs to a targeted profile, or originates from an area under Al-Shabaab control.
What is the Home Office position on Somali returns?
The Home Office relies on MOJ country guidance and July 2025 CPINs to assert that return to Mogadishu is safe for ordinary civilians with clan support or diaspora remittances. Expert evidence challenges this by demonstrating individual risk factors and current security deterioration.